Monday, November 9, 2009

Dollar Index Technicals

Figure 1 is a weekly chart of the US Dollar Index (symbol: $DXY). The pink labeled price bars within the ovals are positive divergence bars.

Figure 1. $DXY/ weekly

The US Dollar Index remains in a downtrend. However, a weekly close above 76.58, which is the high of the recent positive divergence bar, would nullify that down trend, and in all likelihood, the Dollar Index would trade in a range. A close above the pivot at 79.46 would turn the down trend into an uptrend.

A weekly close below the low (75.20) of the current positive divergence could lead to an acceleration of the down trend as those anticipating a trend reversal give up their losing positions. This is the "this time is different" scenario but in reverse.

Some of the prior articles on the Dollar Index, which explain some of the strategies that I use to arrive at these conclusions, are located here:


The technical picture for the Dollar Index is pretty straight forward. And while "everything under the sun" goes up when the Dollar goes down, it is still my contention that commodities will out perform equities if only because in this liquidity driven environment equities will be prone to sudden sell offs. As a reminder, you may want to review the article "The Inflation Indicator Meets The "Dumb Money" Indicator".

On Market Timing

Everyone tries to time the market to some degree. Just the acts of buying and selling are exercises in market timing. We want the best price, and I don't know anyone who can argue with that. We all want to buy low and sell high, and we all want to do it over and over again. The problem is that, like hitting a baseball, market timing is not a feat that can be done by everybody, and even the best must accept that they won't be successful most of the time.

Over a lifetime, being a 300 hitter will get you into the hall of fame. It is being consistently good over a period of time that counts. In trading, depending upon your style, it is being good over a period of time that will make the difference. There is no way you will get it right all the time.

But think about that for a moment. Getting a hit 3 out of 10 times you step up to bat will earn you immortality. 3 out of 10 seems mediocre, but in baseball it is greatness. In trading, fortunately we can do better, but like in baseball, perfection is not required.

So what do I mean by style? If you are a long term trend follower, most would agree that a 40 to 50% hit rate is good; in other words, you are going to lose more than 50% of the time. But if you do it right, the profit factor, which is the ratio of gross profit to gross loss, should be relatively high. It could be as high as 10 to 1. If done right, you will have a lot of little losers and several big winners.

Another style is to have a lot of winning trades. Let's say you want to get 70 to 80% of your trades right all the time. This implies that your profit factor will be more like 1 to 1. So for every dollar you risk, you expect to make one dollar in profit, and you expect to do that 70 to 80% of the time.

Your style is your choice. Do you want to be a singles hitter or a home run hitter? Both have their appeal and advantages and disadvantages. You style is what is comfortable for you. Whatever you choose to do, just choose to do it consistently.

But that is the rub as the problem most people have with market timing is that it is very difficult to execute in a disciplined fashion. It isn't that timing the market is hard to do; it is that most people cannot do it in a disciplined, consistent fashion.

So why is that?

I believe the difficulties that investors have with market timing is that they don't have a plan. They are unable to articulate when they will buy and sell. They are unable to articulate what they will buy and sell. They are unable to articulate how much they will buy and sell.

In my opinion, the best way to develop a plan is through the back testing process. Make an observation about market behavior and design a study to see if that observation would have made money. But there is more to the back testing process than finding a strategy that is profitable. This is just the first step. The back testing process can tell you if the strategy is acceptable to you or not. For example, a strategy may be profitable but you may have to go through a 40% draw down or loss to your capital to achieve that market beating performance. Now ask yourself this question: can you execute a profitable strategy that has a draw down of 40%?

By putting a strategy through the back testing process, it creates the expectation of how that strategy might perform going forward. Of course, the past does not always predict the future, but if we don't know how things worked in the past, we will never know how they work in the future. We should not expect the past to predict the future. The past should only be a guide that will allow us to function in the future.

Let's take another example from the medical field. I have performed over 10,000 epidural injections in the last 20 years. The possibility that I will encounter difficulty with the next injection is very possible. The likelihood that I wouldn't be able to solve that problem -because I have seen almost everything- is low. This comes through experience, and the back testing process is a way of creating that historical perspective.

The back testing process and the development of an investing plan provide another very important key to successful trading and investing. You need to have an objective way of measuring how you are functioning in the markets. How else do you know if your plan is working if you don't have a way to measure its effectiveness? A disciplined approach provides that framework for benchmarking future returns and losses.

So let's stop and summarize. Market timing is just finding the best times to buy and sell. It doesn't mean you will get everyone right. Back testing improves the market timing process of buying low and selling high by creating future expectations of performance and by creating a framework from which we can benchmark future performance. Going forward, this creates discipline as it provides the necessary tools to function in the markets, which can be a very hostile environment.

Two other considerations are noteworthy.

First, you should know what you are buying and why. This is rule #5 of my "11 Rules For Better Trading":

"Understand your market edge. My edge is my ability to use my computer to define the price action. I level the playing field by trading markets and not companies."

Second, have a money management strategy. That is, know how much you want to buy and why. A sound money management strategy will keep losses acceptable and allow profits to run. It sounds simple and you have heard those words a thousand times, but it is really true. There are few things you can control in the markets, but money management is one of them. This is rule #6.

In short, I know what I am going to buy and sell and I know why I am going to buy and sell. If I get it wrong, which does happen, I have my money management strategy to back me up.

I hope this analysis provides you with some insight as to why I think market timing is a useful approach. We all do it. I just want to do it better!

Sunday, November 8, 2009

Investor Sentiment: Changes Within The Indicators

Every week that I put together these comments, I pay great attention to the words that I write. Last week's key points were: 1) the range continues; 2) seasonal tendencies and being at the bottom of a well defined trend channel argue for a bounce; 3) we need to see the excesses of bullish sentiment unwound before we have meaningfully higher prices; 4) the risk of a market down draft remains great. This week investor sentiment has become very convoluted suggesting even greater care in the words I choose. So let's get to it.

The "Dumb Money" indicator, which is shown in figure 1, looks for extremes in the data from 4 different groups of investors who historically have been wrong on the market: 1) Investor Intelligence; 2) Market Vane; 3) American Association of Individual Investors; and 4) the put call ratio. The "Dumb Money" indicator shows that investors are extremely bullish.

Figure 1. "Dumb Money" Indicator/ weekly

With regards to the "Dumb Money" indicator there is no change. Investors remain bullish to an extreme. This implies a trading range with an upward bias until the excesses of bullish sentiment are unwound. However, the American Association of Individual Investors data, which is one of the components of the "Dumb Money" indicator, has turned decidedly negative on the market, and typically, this bearish stance is a bullish signal. In fact, as we can see in figure 2, their bearishness is at levels seen just prior to the market's lift off in July of this year.

Figure 2. AAII/ weekly

The "Smart Money" indicator is shown in figure 3. The "smart money" indicator is a composite of the following data: 1) public to specialist short ratio; 2) specialist short to total short ratio; 3) SP100 option traders. The "smart money" is neutral. There is no change in the "Smart Money" indicator.

Figure 3. "Smart Money" Indicator/ weekly

Figure 4 is a weekly chart of the S&P500 with the InsiderScore "entire market" value in the lower panel. What we notice is that the value is moving above the upper trading band. Moves above this level are considered bullish, and in fact, this is the highest level of insider buying in about 6 months. However, buying wasn't broad based or significant, and outside of the financial sector, "there was only a modest deviation in sentiment week-over-week towards a less bearish stance." In other words, "bullish signals weren't backed up by actual transactions."

Figure 4. InsiderScore Entire Market/ weekly

Figure 5 is a daily chart of the S&P500 with the amount of assets in the Rydex bullish and leveraged funds versus the amount of assets in the leveraged and bearish funds. Not only do we get to see what direction these market timers think the market will go, but we also get to see how much conviction (i.e., leverage) they have in their beliefs. Typically, we want to bet against the Rydex market timer even though they only represent a small sample of the overall market. As of Friday's close, the assets in the bearish and leveraged funds were greater than the bullish and leveraged; referring to figure 5, this would put the red line greater than green line.

Figure 5. Rydex Money Market/ daily

However, when we look at the entire Rydex data more closely, we note that the amount of assets in the Rydex Money Market Fund remains very low and this is a sign of greed. Typically, when the Rydex market timers move to a bearish and leveraged position as they are now, we see money coming out of the market (or moving to the sidelines) to the safety of the money market fund. We don't have that now. The Rydex market timers appear to be both bearish and bullish, which is quite unusual.

So where do we stand? I don't like to massage the data nor rationalize the signals given by the indicators, and I won't do that here. The sum of the data would suggest that the words that I have been stating for the past 4 weeks still apply:

"Equities are for renting not owning at this juncture. I am not calling for a market top, but prices should trade more in a range, and if you intend to play on the long side, it will be important to maintain your discipline (for risk reasons) and buy at the lows of that trading range and sell at the highs to extract any profits from this market. The upward bias still remains as long as investor sentiment is still extremely bullish, but there is probably greater risk of a market down draft now than in past weeks."

The changes within the indicators are noteworthy, but there is still nothing noteworthy regarding the indicators.

Over the past week, the expected bounce has materialized and the market is now short term overbought. Will the bulls have the necessary fire power to break the trading range? While certain aspects of the sentiment data would suggest that this is possible, the sum of the data tells me that very little has changed.

Friday, November 6, 2009

Rydex Market Timers: Extremely Mixed

Figure 1 is a daily chart of the S&P500 with the amount of assets in the Rydex Money Market Fund in the lower panel.

Figure 1. S&P500 v. Rydex Money Market/ daily

Figure 2 is a daily chart of the S&P500 with the amount of assets in the Rydex bullish and leveraged funds versus the amount of assets in the leveraged and bearish funds.

Figure 2. Rydex Bullish and Leveraged v. Bearish and Leveraged/ daily

At first blush when looking at these two graphs, you would have to say that the bearish and leveraged Rydex market timer is betting against the market to an extreme degree as the red line is greater than the green line in figure 2. Why would someone assume it is extreme? Because the amount of assets in the Rydex Money Market Fund is extremely low.

However, my interpretation is that this represents a mixed short term sentiment picture. The assets in the leveraged bear funds are greater than the leveraged bull funds and this is bullish. But truth be told, the ratio is not too extreme. On the other had, the amount of assets in the Rydex Money Market Fund is low and for the past several months, this has been bearish as this is a sign of greed. Typically, one does not see this combination of bearish and leveraged greater than bullish and leveraged associated with low levels of assets in the money market fund. I guess one can surmise that the bears are getting greedy. But that isn't how it normally works. Assets in the money market are usually higher and rising (as a sign of fear) when the bearish and leveraged assets are greater than the bullish and leveraged assets.

However, looking a little more closely at the data from Wednesday to Thursday, we note that about $200 million dollars came out of the Rydex Money Market Fund and close to $200 million dollars went in to the Rydex bearish and leveraged assets. So yes, the Rydex bearish and leveraged assets are high relative to the bullish and leveraged and the assets in the Rydex Money Market Funds are low, and if appears those assets came out of the money market fund to make a bearish bet. The bulls haven't given up yet.

In sum, my interpretation of these two extremes is that it represents a mixed picture, and this is not the norm.

Lastly, I want to thank Johnny G. who has been nice enough to post some his findings and interpretation of the Rydex asset data in the comment sections of the blog. Great work!

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

This Just In!

My friend Tyler, who sends me his morning report that he prepares for clients, highlighted the following front page article in today's Wall Street Journal: "Fears of a New Bubble as Cash Pours In".

From the article: "Concerns are mounting that efforts by governments and central banks to stoke a recovery will create a nasty side effect: asset bubbles in real estate, stock and currency markets, especially in Asis."

Tyler's response: "There is a bubble in bubble calling."

Excellent call, Tyler!

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

What's Wrong With Consumer Confidence?

This is an interesting video taken from CNBC's "Squawk On The Street".

The show's host, Mark Haines, is incredulous that last Tuesday's consumer confidence number came in lower than expected. Haines mutters: "What the heck is that all about?" As Haines goes onto explain, housing is higher in most major markets and corporate profits are better. The only thing missing was the next statement out of his mouth, and I will fill in the blanks: "What do people want?"

It just goes to show how divorced Wall Street is from Main Street.

The show's talking heads or those people in the boxes suggest that the real angst Americans have is rising gas prices at the pump, increasing health care costs, and an uncertain labor market. This is all true, but I don't think that it is the real source of America's angst.















The real source of America's angst is a sense that something is terribly wrong. What that something is isn't tangible -like higher gas prices - but it is palpable. Maybe it is the lack of leadership in Washington or the inability of that leadership to do anything but put our problems off for another day.

There is no collective purpose to the actions coming out of Washington. There is no common cause that Americans can rally around. Bailouts and government programs, like "cash for clunkers", have perpetuated the same old thing. The bailouts have favored the connected or those who where irresponsible in the first place. Is this the American way?

This is not the change that Americans wanted. They voted for it, but this is not the change that Americans wanted.

So what kind of change did Americans want?

For this we need to go back to September, 2001 and the War on Terror. With the attack on America, President Bush was handed a golden opportunity to galvanize Americans in a common cause, but instead all he asked of his fellow countrymen was to go to the malls and continue shopping. The soldier in combat made the sacrifice, but this is what they do. Their sacrifice was unconditional, and this was understood and accepted by all. But where was the sacrifice asked of the ordinary American here at home? At the very least, shouldn't we have been asked to cut back on our consumption of large cars and oil to decrease our reliance on those very same foreigners who were at war with America? I am sure my fellow citizens would have been willing to act for the greater good, but they were never asked. This was President Bush's biggest failing.

Now we come to President Obama. His crisis isn't the War on Terror, but a generational economic crisis. President Obama did come to the electorate and say "we need to change the way we do business" referring to the grid lock and bipartisanship in Washington. I think the President believed this. From an idealogical perspective, Republicans and Democrats need to work together to solve the problems this country faces.

Despite the political rhetoric, President Obama did not understand the kind of change Americans seek. It isn't so much what he has done (i.e., wasted a lot of money) but what he has failed to do (i.e, galvanize the country in a common cause) that is so discouraging. Even if the other guy (Senator McCain) was elected, he probably would have done the same thing - thrown good money after bad - as this was what was being recommended by the economic leaders of this country. Oh, these were the same economic leaders who missed the crisis in the first place.

But like his predecessor, President Obama is missing what kind of change Americans really want and why there continues to be so much dissatisfaction. Americans are willing and ready to make that sacrifice to improve their nation and the future of this nation for their children - provided that burden is shared by all. The only problem is that no one has asked them to make that sacrifice for a common cause, and the window of opportunity for the Obama administration to come to the American people and unite them toward a common goal has closed or is closing quickly.

As measures to resuscitate the economy begin to peter out, the fragile underpinnings of the economy will begin to be exposed yet once again. The likelihood of throwing more money after the problem - in front of a mid term election - is becoming increasingly diminished. With no real economic catalyst to sustainable growth and with very little fixed after this crisis, one really needs to ask what does the Obama economic team do next?

One thing is for sure: the time to ask the American people to unite in a common goal passed long ago when the President first took office. This was the one option that has been squandered, and this is why Americans remain so dissatisfied.

Sunday, November 1, 2009

Dollar Technicals

Figure 1 is a weekly chart of the US Dollar Index (symbol: $DXY). The pink labeled price bars within the ovals are positive divergence bars.

Figure 1. $DXY/ weekly

The US Dollar Index remains in a downtrend. However, a weekly close above 76.58, which is the high of the recent positive divergence bar, would nullify that down trend, and in all likelihood, the Dollar Index would trade in a range. A close above the pivot at 79.46 would turn the down trend into an uptrend.

Some of the prior articles on the Dollar Index, which explain some of the strategies that I use to arrive at these conclusions, are located here:




While the technicals from my perspective are pretty straightforward, the question remains what impact will a higher Dollar have on equities and commodities. The common assumption is that a higher dollar can only mean one thing: a flight to quality as the reflation or risk trade is over. I am not sure that is going to be the case here. Equities do look weak as many sectors have been breaking down over the past month, but gold and crude oil still look very strong despite the recent market turbulence. So if we do get that higher Dollar, it will be interesting to see how the commodities react versus equities.